
The local press reported the news that ACTT had decided to hive off their housing stock to give the company unique in the future of local public transport in the province of Treviso, only vehicles and personnel.
This is the confirmation of a hypothesis that had already been made in recent months for ATM and CTM, and that is obviously the solution to the problem of the difference between capital La Marca (who does not own the buildings in which it operates) and the three companies towns of Treviso, Castelfranco Veneto and instead have a substantial real estate assets. ACTT
separating the buildings, ATM and CTM is weakened and becomes the subject stronger brand that can be assigned to lead the new company, as the president wants Muraro.
The question, however, has two effects far from negligible in terms of higher costs for citizens and users of public transport.

1) In addition to the new board and new management structure of the 'company only' life would remain in administrative bodies and administrative structures of the old (albeit scaled) old society: why the public ( who are the shareholders last, by provinces and municipalities, both the old and the new company) should "pay twice" the prebend of board members and the costs of bureaucratic and administrative structures?
2) The new company will operate on property granted locazione dalle vecchie società ("ridotte" ad immobiliari) e dovrà pagare degli affitti a prezzo di mercato per questo utilizzo, oppure dovrà acquistare edifici ed officine, sempre a prezzi di mercato. Le vecchie società faranno utili sugli immobili di proprietà e l'"azienda unica" avrà maggiori costi perché dovrà pagare affitti che le vecchie società non pagavano.
In buona sostanza, per i cittadini-utenti non ci sarà nessun vantaggio economico da questa "doppia gestione", anzi ci sarà un aumento del costo del trasporto pubblico (che significherà tagli alle linee o zumento delle tariffe), un aumento di costi che i cittadini della Marca dovranno pagare per questo gioco di "scatole Chinese "that does not include the economic and financial reasons.
Or rather, it is understood that the common owners of the last" real estate companies "ex-transport companies ACTT, ATM, CTM. get the profits from these companies (under rents paid to them by the new company only) and can do what they want this money because they will not be bound to use them to finance the local public transport.