
The resolution of the Board's 2008 approval of the property at Rising City, Province and Foundation Cassamarca expected to change the intended use of ex-court, ex-magistrate, ex-prisoners need an opinion of the Superintendence which then find expression again in the examination of the rehabilitation projects.
Of this opinion there is no sign of change in the resolution of the intended use of the complex in December of 2009, the resolution was then withdrawn as a result of our extraordinary appeal to the Head of State. But there is no trace of opinion even in the resolution 14 July 2010 with the amendment of the intended use was repeated after removal of the previous resolution.
After hasty statements in the municipal council on Wednesday: "The opinion is there but do not have one here," it seems that the opinion of the Superintendent with the change of use of the three buildings there is not really.
Majority Government and are busy at this time groped to find a way out of the impasse formally: it is excluded, however, that they leave with dignity seen what has happened in these twelve months.
The process of change in urban destination of the complex, in fact, was from the beginning messed up, since - in December last year - has used a national law being rejected by the Constitutional Court of speeding.
The Court's ruling and our subsequent use of forced to abandon this first resolution and to present it again in July, supported by regional legislation enacted in the meantime, but even here, as we have seen, the resolution is far from unassailable.
The absence of the opinion of the Superintendent and the direct transfer to the Foundation will continue to do battle with all the tools at our disposal because the issue is not only to formal requirements of the resolutions, but it is a political issue.
This fact is also the time to reiterate the two reasons why Another Treviso to intervene repeatedly for the approval of the sale to the Foundation Cassamarca complex of Piazza Duomo.
1) Our political struggle is aimed at maintaining the function of public buildings of Piazza Duomo, is against privatization because we want their strategic area of \u200b\u200bthe center continues to be serving the city, housing facilities for young people, the 'associations, culture, social and political initiatives.
If we turned to the administrative judiciary (and do it again if necessary) or if we look to the Court of Auditors (in the absence della gara d’asta per scegliere l’acquirente del complesso) è solo perché la maggioranza che governa il Comune è sorda ad ogni tipo di proposta alternativa, è indisponibile al confronto democratico: non ci resta, quindi, che utilizzare gli strumenti offerti dalla giustizia per ottenere l'obiettivo che ci prefiggiamo, quello di evitare che anche il complesso immobiliare di piazza Duomo sia vittima di una speculazione edilizia.
2) Con questa battaglia vogliamo anche segnalare una volta di più ai cittadini che, al di là di schermaglie verbali e cortine fumogene varie, l’amministrazione comunale continua a cedere a Fondazione Cassamarca “pezzi” importanti della città e, di fatto, a consegnarle choices about the future of the entire old town and Treviso. From San Leonardo
former district, theaters, ex-Appiah, the Foundation and the City has decided merely to obey the orders of De Poli, ratified major changes to the draft without any influence on the project City Foundation, giving up one of its express, resigning all'inanità strategic choices for Treviso.
And this is perhaps the most important plan of the battle, because it brings into question the agreement ten years on "partition" of the city government: the City drains to put on and take off benches (and now an office with window to the square of the former in exchange Singoria court), the Foundation of strategic decisions and major projects.
We try to stop them on the line of the former court.