I dubbi sul recupero delle Officine ex-Scardellato.
Urban Tool Implementation of private initiative called "Yards" in places Stiore (area ex-Scardellato) adopted by Municipal Council Resolution No. 416 of 03.11.2010 has several controversial aspects that must be addressed during the approval process of the project.
1. Unsolved problems in the definition of the intervention.
not defined the nature intervention, but was clearly a private initiative aimed at a legitimate profit of who is doing, it must not be granted any exception to urban standards as laid down in terms of "public" there is no reason to believe that the positive aspects of the initiative are significantly higher than negative ones.
2. Subsoil.
We monitored more accurate over the whole area since the first three feet below the surface there is landfill, unsuitable to support the weight of large structures, primarily the silo-up over 20 parking meters.
3. Pollutants.
require the submission of a new series of surveys on the presence of pollutants underground, in a way (number and depth of sampling points, repetition at different times) to ensure a thorough analysis of the presence of pollutants that has already resulted in the recent past to a joint survey City, Province and Arpav.
The surveys should give definite answers on the presence of pollutants in soil and groundwater that may be provided for proper drainage before starting work.
4. The water balance.
Since the city is no need to contribute to the reorganization hydrogeological increasing the discharge capacity of the territory, we propose that the draft be amended so as to ensure not only the hydraulic invariance but to improve the absorption capacity of the object of the action, providing a reservoir volume for collecting precipirazioni widely than is necessary for the simple compensation.
5. The assessment of environmental impact.
also request to review the environmental impact assessment in relation to the results of the latest drilling for possible alterations of the water cycle and the pollutants that eventually would affect the course of Sile.
6. The parking spaces and green.
Porponiamo It requires, therefore, to revise the design of green, increasing the surface (in the project are expected 190 meters of green area of \u200b\u200bover 18,000 of the project area), reducing the share of public parking in the silos and reallocated to private so as to guarantee the standards of parking in spite of an increase in the designated area for green.
7. The area to the shopping destination.
It is proposed to be indicated in the definition of a commercial size limit for each structure, the number of facilities provided and to exclude the cumulation of licenses in the hands of the same person or related persons to avoid the settlement of large structures favoring as that of traditional businesses.
8. The problems of traffic circulation.
Since the complex will bring additional traffic on Noalese in downtown San Jose and that this increase is not supportable by the district already polluted and dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists ask to be given immediate commencement of the design and implementation of the doubling in Noalese 'Trevisoservizi area to allow it results already achieved and will be used when you have finished building the office complex, commercial and craft covered by the USA whose viability may be connected to the riser itself.